Mathematical modeling of
longshore load transport near Latvian harbour Ventspils
U. Bethers, J. Sennikovs
Laboratory for
mathematical modeling of environmental and technological processes, University of Latvia, 8 Zellu, Riga, Latvia
A longshore load transport near
Latvian harbour Ventspils is investigated by means of mathematical modeling. A
set of models, including description of wave field, near-shore hydrodynamics,
bed and suspended load transport, and seabed dynamics, is developed. The models
are verified comparing model's predictions and surveys' results for particular
storm period. The impact of different storm events is analyzed. The artificial
forcing data sets are synthesized from meteorological data. These data sets are
used for model forecasting of sedimentation and erosion rates in typical and
critical seasons.
1 Introduction
A longshore load transport is a typical feature of about 500 km long, almost
sandy Latvian shoreline (see Fig.1). The southwestern winds prevail at the
Latvian coast of Baltic proper, especially during autumn and winter storm
periods. The breaking waves produce longshore currents causing about 1 million
m3 integral northward sand transport yearly. Reasonable processes of
the depth redistribution occur besides the transit load transport. These
processes of sedimentation and erosion are the most developed in the interaction
of the load transport with the hydroengineering constructions and the sea
entrance channels of seaports. The largest Latvian harbour is Ventspils (see
Fig.1) with approximately 16 m deep and 120 m wide sea entrance channel. The
sedimentation causes reduction of the navigation safety and raises the
maintenance costs there. The reconstruction of this seaport started 1996
including the widening (up to 140 m) and deepening (up to 17.7 m) of the sea
entrance channel. Thus, seaport faced also the problems of (i) prediction of the
increase of sedimentation volume after reconstruction, (ii) estimation of the
efficiency of the overdredging additional areas to support continuous
navigation.
 |
 |
| Figure 1. The coastline of Latvia. Major harbours and rivers
included. |
Figure 2. Scheme of physical processes nearby
harbour. |
2 Physical processes
The principal scheme of the physical processes governing sedimentation in a
sea entrance channel of seaport is shown on Fig.2.
- Wave vectors are almost parallel to the wind in the far sea. Wave fronts
transforming in a shallow coastal area, reach the breaking zone non-parallel
to the isobaths.
- Part of the wave energy transforms into (energetic) longshore current with
maximum discharge at about 3 to 6 m depth. The longshore current carries
material load, partially in suspension. It inclines seawards (to the greater
depths) before wave-breakers.
- The longshore current decelerates at the greater depths and becomes
oversaturated. Sedimentation is a consequence of the above.
- Oversaturation of the longshore current becomes even more expressed in the
artificial sea entrance channel. Bed load transport stops there, whilst the
depletion of the suspension depends on the width of the channel.
- The longshore current is undersatured and decelerated passing the seaport.
It restores a pre-harbour velocity almost as close as waves are able to
diffract into the shadow zone after the downwind wave-breaker.
- Bottom erosion downwind from the harbour is caused by the restoring of
saturation load capacity of the longshore current.
- The decrease of the depths in the upwind side of harbour shifts the
wave-breaking zone seawards. This results in growth of the beach there, whilst
opposite trends are typical for the downwind side of the harbour.
The
above scheme is valid for a single storm event. However, repetitiveness of the
storms producing northward load transport exceeds 60% near Ventspils. Hence, the
described development (Fig.2) represents a typical trend of the seabed evolution
there.
3 Mathematical model
The two-dimensional wave-field model is developed assuming that (i)
waves are linear and monochromatic, (ii) wave field is quasi-steady-state, (iii)
wave energy in the breaking zone is dependent only on water depth, (iv) the
calculation of wave direction can be separated from the calculation of wave
energy. We assume the dispersion relation [1] w2=gkth(kh), where w is an angular frequency of monochromatic wave, g is
acceleration due to the gravity, k is an absolute value of the wave vector
k, h is a water depth. The quasi-stationarity of the wave field allows to
simplify the kinematical relation [1]:
  |
(1) |
Thus,
the wave direction can be calculated independently by means of stationaring the
equations (similarly to [2])
,  |
(2) |
where respective absolute values of
wave phase velocity C=w0/k and group
velocity Cg=0.5C[1+2kh/sh(2kh)] are given as in [1].
The quasi-steady-state equation for wave energy stands as
 |
(3) |
here H is waveheight, r is water density. We assume that in the breaking zone
waveheight is dependent only on the water depth
. Eq. (3.2) is used instead of
transfer equation (3.1) to calculate the wave energy under condition of breaking
waves. The field of the wave energy calculated by (3) determines the tensor of
the radiation stresses [3,4]
 |
(4) |
The setting of
wave energy E and direction of the wave vector k are necessary on the
inlets (kn<0) of the calculation domain (see Fig. 3). On the far-sea
boundary we assume k being parallel to the wind vector W and
employ empirical relationships H=H(W) and w
0=w0(H) from the statistical
analysis of 4 years' wave and 19 years wind observations. The solution of
one-dimensional equations (1-3) is given as a boundary condition for k
and E on the one of the boundaries (inlet) that is orthogonal to the coastline.
 |
| Figure 3. Boundary conditions. |
The calculation of the non-steady coastal
hydrodynamics is performed under shallow water approximation, accounting for
wave and wind forces, water level fluctuations, bottom friction and turbulent
momentum exchange, but neglecting the gradients of water density and air
pressure, and moving boundaries of the calculation domain. The shallow water
equations under above assumptions then stand as
 |
(5) |
 |
here q is water flux vector, z is water elevation, v is vertically averaged
velocity, m and Cw are, respectively,
turbulent exchange and wind drag coefficients. The Chezy coefficient of bottom
friction is given by [5]
 |
(6) |
where d stands for average
grain diameter. The boundary conditions for (5) see on Fig.3; q=0 on
coastline, q is parallel to boundary on far-sea. One and two Dirichlet
conditions are supplied for, respectively, downwind (
) and upwind (qx,
qy) side boundaries, from the one-dimensional solution of (1-5).
The load-transport model is developed under the assumptions that:
- the bed and suspended load transport can be calculated separately;
- the uniform grain size dispersion is assumed with d» 0.2 mm;
- the parameterization of the unidirectional flow can be used for load
transport;
- the infinitely thick layer of sand material is available on the seabed.
The equation for bed load flux is adopted from [6]
 |
(7) |
The non-dimensional grain
size function here is given by
 |
(8) |
In (7-8) q is the Shield's function of load particles, q =u2/[gd(s-1)], kinematic viscosity h » 1.5·10-6
m2/s, s» 2.65, friction velocity
, and critical
value of the Shield’s function is given by [6]
 |
(9) |
The
vertically integrated equation for the depth-averaged concentration c of
suspended load stands as
 |
(10) |
where the velocity of
sedimentation/erosion is given by
A=-w[c0(c)-c0(c*)], here the velocity of
sinking of particles w=gd2(s-1)/18h ,
c* is the saturation concentration of the suspended load. We assume
that the estimation of the value of the near-bottom concentration
c0=b c (b» 2) is
valid both for sedimentation and erosion.
The saturation
concentration c* is given as a boundary condition for (10) on the
inflow boundary (qn<0) of the calculation domain.
Finally, the equation of seabed dynamics can be
written with known qb and c fields
 |
(11) |
where e » 0.3 is the seabed porosity,
r d=2650 kg/m3 is the sand
density. We assume that the initial depth distribution remains unchanged on all
boundaries of the inner part of the calculation domain (see Fig.3).
4 Numerical solution
The numerical solution of the developed mathematical model is performed by
means of finite element method. The approximations of the wave refraction
equation (2) and steady wave energy transfer equation (3) are done by
Petrov-Galerkin method with streamline upwinding [7] against
Cg direction. The non-steady hydrodynamical problem (5) is
solved similarly to [8], using Bubnov-Galerkin method [9] for the spatial
discretization, splitting the time step, and employing Lagrangian integration of
convective terms along streamlines [10]. The non-steady suspended load transport
equation (10) is solved by implicit two-layer time scheme, using Petrov-Galerkin
spatial discretization. The seabed dynamics (11) is calculated explicitly.
The quasi-steady-state of the wave field is assumed for 6 hour long time
periods. It corresponds to the characteristic observation frequency for both
wind and waves. Thus, wave field parameters and hydrodynamics are calculated in
the outer region (see Fig.3) reaching the steady-state conditions. Then these
fields are recalculated in more details as non-steady-state problem within the
embedded inner region using the outer domain results as boundary conditions. The
problems of load transport and seabed dynamics are solved only in the inner
domain. The back-impact of changing bathymetry on the hydrodynamics is accounted
for this region.
5 Characteristic storm events
The calculation series for (quasi-)steady-state wave field and hydrodynamics
are performed to investigate the hydrology for different storm events. The flow
patterns for two wind directions see on Fig.4. The basic conclusions regarding
the character of physical processes for different storms stand as follows.
- The load transport near Ventspils is governed by the energetic longshore
currents. Wind currents and gradiental longshore currents are much less
important.
- The wave breaking against southern wave-breaker in the case of western
winds, and against the northern wave-breaker in the case of northern winds
(for this situation see lower Fig.4) produces the recirculation oriented
against the main longshore current. Thus, for these situations the longshore
current is decelerated before crossing the sea entrance channel, and shifted
seawards.
- The northwestern wind causes the similar effect. It produces recirculation
patterns with flow direction away from sea entrance channel along both wave
breakers but the weak longshore current is pushed more than 500 m seawards.
Thus, this type of storm events causes mainly raise of the water level via
wave set-up.
- The southwestern winds (see upper Fig.4) would be the most dangerous from
the point of view of sedimentation. The wave breaking against the southern
wave breaker raises the transport capacity of longshore current. It flows
across the channel directly along the port entrance, contrary to the cases of
N and W winds.
 |
| Figure 4. Flow patterns near Ventspils harbour during SW(left) and
N(right) storms. |
6 Verification of model
The verification of the model is performed via the comparison of model
predictions with surveys’ results. A particular winter storm period from 27th of
December, 1991 until 19th of January, 1992 is selected. This period is
characteristic with enlarged changes in bathymetry because of
- high storm frequency, i.e. winds above 7 m/s was registered in 43.5% of
this 23 days long time period;
- high storm variability, i.e. 42.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 25% of storm events
were in, respectively, SW, W, NW, and N sectors;
- no maintenance dredgeworks affecting the natural processes.
The
comparison of model prediction with depth difference between surveys is shown on
Fig.5, but sedimentation volume summarized in the table below.
|
Volume (m3) |
Channel |
Southern areas |
Northern areas |
Total |
|
Model prediction |
69.4 |
132.9 |
19.2 |
221.5 |
|
Surveys |
72.4 |
107.2 |
23.7 |
203.3 |
The quantitative agreement of
integral sedimentation as well as for maximum depth change and its location is
reasonable. Therefore it is assumed that proposed model is suitable for
forecasting despite several qualitative disagreements indicated on Fig.5.
 |
| Figure 5. Measured and calculated depth differences after particular
storm period (from 27-Dec-91 to 19-Jan-92) |
7 Prognostic calculations
The analysis of the meteorological (forcing) data was done to perform the
model forecasts. The statistical analysis of wind data for 19 years long
observation period allowed to create the artificial forcing data sets for
characteristic and critical seasons. We assume four seasons for a year (each 3
months long). The repetitiveness and the sequence of storm events in the
artificial data sets are close to real observation series. The winters are
characteristic with enlarged southern wind repetitiveness. The cold winters are
usually calm, whilst mild (Atlantic) winters are stormy. The most important
storm events occur in SW or N sector. The average wind speed for typical winter
is 4.7 m/s (storm probability above 8 m/s is 14%) but for critical winter 6.1
m/s (storm probability is 30%). The autumns are even more stormy with high storm
probability in all directions from open sea. The average wind speed is 5.0 m/s
(storm probability 18%) for the characteristic but 6.9 m/s (storm probability
41%) for the critical autumn.
The forecasts of the depth redistribution are performed during above eight
seasons (four critical and four typical) for (i) existing configuration of sea
entrance channel of Ventspils harbour, (ii) reconstructed (widened and deepened)
channel, (iii) reconstructed channel with additional 12 m deep overdredged areas
(see Fig.6 for configuration).
 |
| Figure 6. Configuration of additionaly overdredged area near sea
entrance channel. |
Conclusions
The prognostic calculations lead to following conclusions concerning the
sedimentation in the sea entrance channel of Ventspils harbour:
- The navigation regime cannot be maintained without dredgeworks during
critical autumn and winter seasons.
- The total amount of sedimentation in the overdredged areas is 1.1 million
m3 per year. It would raise 1.4 times after the reconstruction. The
total sedimentation volume is greater than the integral northward load
transport because channel traps the sand from both directions during
particular storm events.
- The seasonal distribution of sedimentation in the typical year is 46%
during autumn, 33% during winter, 17% in summer but only 4% in spring.
- Southwestern winds cause up to 79% but northern winds about 19% of the
total sedimentation in the sea entrance channel. The role of western and
northwestern wind is almost negligible.
- The efficiency of the better of additional overdredged areas (see Fig.6,
configuration 4) does not exceed 11%, i.e. it reduces the sedimentation in the
channel by 80,000 m3 trapping 680,000 m3 of sand itself.
Acknowledgment
This investigation was funded by Ventspils Port Authority under contract
0396/1-b. The acknowledge also the Latvian Science Council for its support.
References
- O.M.Phillips, F.R.S. The dynamics of the upper ocean. 2nd ed., Cambridge
University Press, 1977, 319 p.
- P.Milbradt. Zur mathematischen Modellierung großräumiger Wellen- und
Strömungsvorgänge. Diss. Hannover, Inst. für Bauinformatik, 1995, 109 S.
- M.S.Longuet-Higgins. Mass transport in the boundary layer at a free
oscillating surface. J Fluid Mech. (8), 1960, pp. 293-306.
- M.S.Longuet-Higgins, R.W.Stewart. The changes in amplitude of short
gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents. J. Fluid Mech. (10), 1961, pp.
529-549.
- Formation and dynamics of load in the rivers and coastal zone. Ed.
A.E.Michinov, Moscow, VINITI, 1991, 184 p., in Russian.
- L.C. van Rijn. Sediment transport, part I: bed load transport. J.
Hydraulic Eng. (110), No.10, 1984, pp. 1431-1456.
- T.Zienkewicz. The Finite Element Method. 4nd ed., Springer Verlag, 1992.
- J.Sennikovs, U.Bethers. Shallow water calculation of circulation for Gulf
of Riga. Finnish Marine Research Series. 26 p. In press.
- A.Quarteroni, A.Valli. Numerical approximation of partial differential
equations. Springer Verlag, 1994.
- Benque, J.A.Cunge, J.Fenilet, A.Hauguel, F.M.Holly. New method for tidal
current computation. J. of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division ASCE
(108), 1982, pp. 396-417.